{"id":395,"date":"2023-12-11T18:02:00","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T18:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/?p=395"},"modified":"2024-05-11T18:44:20","modified_gmt":"2024-05-11T18:44:20","slug":"philosophy-of-interaction-on-discoveries-and-pseudo-discoveries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/?p=395","title":{"rendered":"\u2018PHILOSOPHY OF INTERACTION\u2019 ON DISCOVERIES AND PSEUDO-DISCOVERIES"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Prof Andrei Iezuitoves, PhD, D.Sc. Academician<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Prof Santhi Jayasekera, PhD, D.Sc. Academician, Film Director<\/p>\n\n\n\n


Dear colleagues!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I hope you will agree with me that the main thing for science is the discovery of everything really new in reality, as at all levels and in all manifestations of interaction of material and spiritual principles inherent in reality itself.
Discovery is the interaction, material and spiritual, of the goal and result of scientific research. In discovery, its goal is productive, and the result is purposeful. The goal and the result are materially and spiritually significant, being in interaction, material and spiritual.
Scientific discoveries, in essence, are \u2018binary\u2019. It is a statement of something new in reality, previously unknown to science, and at the same time being in interaction with the explanation of actually existing such new materially and spiritually.
\u2018Binarity\u2019 is \u2018two in one\u2019, not \u2018two apart\u2019 or \u2018two side by side\u2019 as in dualism.
Many people do not easily accept the fundamentally new perceptions of the world around them that fundamental discoveries offer them, and the stronger the inner resistance to accepting them, the more strongly and visibly they move beyond their traditionally stable perceptions of the world. This is natural, and it takes time and patience to assert the new in science and in life.
\u0420. Descartes rightly believed that the truth should be sought in the indomitable human endeavour to \u2018new\u2019, not in the militant retention of the \u2018old\u2019, and \u2018to find the truth, everyone must at least once in his life to free himself from the perceptions he has learned and completely re-build the system of his views\u2019. This is what the Philosophy of Interaction (PI) constantly and insistently calls for and is essentially like.
Pushkin was profoundly right when he asserted that \u2018the best and simplest changes are those that come from the improvement of manners without any violent upheaval.\u2019 \u2018The best and simplest changes\u2019 to people are brought by truly fundamental scientific discoveries, which require honesty, truthfulness from the discoverer and high morality from him. They do not tolerate any violence, material or spiritual.
It should be emphasised that interaction is not a transaction. The principle of \u2018you are mine and I am yours\u2019 does not apply in interaction, as in a transaction, but the principle of \u2018we are each other’s\u2019 in mutual and common interests, with each of the interacting persons not forgetting both themselves and the other. Interaction is voluntary and vitally necessary for both parties. The transaction is forced to a certain extent: it is necessary, it is customary. The transaction can be interrupted by one of the parties at a convenient moment. Interaction can only be interrupted simultaneously and bilaterally.
Science should not consider its own prospects of interaction for politics, but actually enter into direct interaction with it at different levels and in different manifestations important for science.
It is indicative that in the West there has now appeared, if I may say so, a philosophy which claims that science is not science and everything in the world is constructed by certain \u2018systems of language\u2019 and \u2018subconsciousness\u2019, therefore \u2018objective knowledge is impossible to achieve\u2019. This is nothing but a variant of agnosticism. Naturally, discoveries are out of the question. FS is the future of the whole world, a world without violence, material and spiritual. Science, through its discoveries, is called upon to affirm this materially and spiritually.
Language does not exist by itself or arbitrarily. It designates real phenomena, material and spiritual, which are cognisable by science and therefore contain discoveries.
Modern science in principle cannot stay aside, materially and spiritually, from the wars raging on our planet, threatening the life of mankind, everyone and everything.
Science, in essence, is peace-loving. The purpose of science is to bring people good, not evil. Another thing is that the achievements of science can actually be used for anti-human purposes. This is especially true of fundamental discoveries.
Thus, as he is called, the \u2018father of the atomic bomb\u2019 Robert Oppenheimer was at first very enthusiastic about \u2018interesting physics\u2019, but after seeing the mass death of people from the atomic bomb, created on the basis of his fundamental discovery, fell into a deep depression and soon died. Austrian physicist Lise Meitner, who is called \u2018the mother of the atomic bomb\u2019, theoretically discovered the possibility of the atomic bomb, but refused to participate in its practical creation as a weapon of mass destruction of people.
These examples are very instructive for today’s scientists. Science can and must serve not war but world peace. This is realised by the pioneering scientists themselves and such \u2018parents\u2019 are not dangerous for their \u2018children\u2019.
In our time, many people to reassure themselves against the possible emergence of even more powerful weapons of destruction of people than already existing, refer to the words of Pushkin: \u2018Genius and villainy are incompatible. In fact, in Pushkin they look differently. In Pushkin’s tragedy \u2018Mozart and Salieri\u2019 they are uttered as a question-and-answer by Salieri and Pushkin himself fully agrees with them: \u2018Genius and villainy are incompatible. Not true.\u2019. Indeed, in reality, \u2018genius and villainy\u2019 are quite co-operative. We can say that the genius \u2018father of the hydrogen bomb\u2019 Edward Teller was in every way and constantly proud of the weapon of mass destruction of people created by him and had no remorse, unlike Oppenheimer, the \u2018father of the atomic bomb\u2019. As we can see, \u2018parents\u2019 are different, and \u2018children\u2019 need to remain vigilant to stop them in time.
As it is known, many people, including scientists, have been trying and trying in vain for many centuries to establish as absolutes such definitions of good and evil, which would be unconditionally accepted by everyone, everywhere, always and in all situations. The fact is that the proposed concepts of good and evil are either too abstract or too concrete and closely related to historically conditioned worldviews and considered normative human behaviour to be truly universal and eternal.
FV will attempt to break this impasse. For FV, everything that in principle, in one way or another, materially and spiritually, promotes interaction, materially and spiritually, is good.
Anything that in principle, in one way or another, materially and spiritually, opposes interaction, materially and spiritually, disrupts and destroys it through violence, materially and spiritually, is evil.
Both good and evil represent the interaction of the general and the particular, the immutable and its historical manifestation, the objective and the subjective, the typological and the immediate-individual, the natural and the acquired, the independent and the educated, etc. It is impossible to enumerate all aspects. The main thing is that it is precisely interaction and anti-interaction, which themselves in principle interact with each other, materially and spiritually, intuitively and consciously. Goethe perceptively wrote about \u2018the power that wants eternally evil, that creates only one good thing\u2019. There is also an expression: \u2018the road to hell is paved with good intentions\u2019. It goes like this. There are no absolutes of good and evil, it is futile and useless to search for them. If, one way or another, we talk about the \u2018absolute true\u2019, it is interaction, material and spiritual.
Happiness is also, in essence, the interaction of man, material and spiritual, with the nature around him, animate and inanimate, his own creations, with internally close people and himself.
Nowadays in geopolitics, as FV believes, pacifism, which is fundamentally related to science, plays a truly outstanding role. Pacifism (from Latin pacificus – pacification) means a special worldview that condemns all wars and demands the establishment of universal peace on Earth.
Alfred Nobel was a pacifist in his views, establishing a special International Peace Prize in his name for \u2018promoting world peace\u2019, and considered \u2018any war a barbarism\u2019, trying potentially and by all means to prevent any war.
Tellingly, the first woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize was a convinced and active pacifist, Bertha von Sutner. Zutner was a defender of the life of all people on Earth against any war, publisher of a special magazine \u2018Down with War!\u2019 and a novel of the same name. Let us recall in this connection E. Hemingway with his novel \u2018Farewell to Arms!\u2019, an opponent of any war and also a Nobel Prize winner.
It is pacifism that is now becoming the true banner of the times for the defenders of world peace.
It is high time that the slogan \u2018para bellum\u2019 (prepare for war) be replaced by \u2018para pax\u2019 (prepare for peace). Preparing for war inevitably leads to and ends in war.
Preparing for peace teaches timely and skilful defence of world peace and the elimination of the threat of any war.
It is time to create a fundamentally new history of mankind without any wars in the present and future.
There are no \u2018special laws of war\u2019. Its only \u2018law\u2019 is to kill people without differentiating them. It is time to stop comforting demagoguery. War in principle does not happen without innocent victims, it is impossible to avoid them. One should realise this and stop any war.
It is demagogically considered \u2018work\u2019 to kill people en masse in war. The more they kill, the better the \u2018work\u2019. This is a profanation of the very phenomenon and the concept of \u2018work\u2019, which is always creative.
Military conflicts on Earth will not stop until they stop dividing people into \u2018ours\u2019 and \u2018not ours\u2019, \u2018theirs\u2019 and \u2018not theirs\u2019. Even sporadically killed \u2018our own\u2019 are mourned. The masses of killed \u2018not our own\u2019 are not even noticed. For mankind all people were, are and will be people \u2018ours\u2019 and \u2018ours\u2019 and all people always had and will have a vital need, materially and spiritually, for world peace.
At present, a large part of people are in a state of \u2018militaristic pandemic\u2019, affected by the \u2018virus of militarism\u2019. A real \u2018militarised madness\u2019 has set in, even a \u2018war syndrome\u2019 has appeared. It is impossible not to recognise it.
Pope Francis timely warns, referring to the various local wars already being waged on our planet, that a partial world war has begun and \u2018nobody cares about it\u2019. It is time to move from words to action. The world is indeed threatened with doom. It is necessary not to take refuge from war, but to exclude it completely from the life of mankind.
At present, there are no \u2018just\u2019 and \u2018unjust\u2019 wars. All wars are \u2018unjust.\u2019 All wars aim at forcibly annexing to the territory of one’s country some part of the country at war with it and thus geopolitically strengthening itself. This clearly violates world peace. There should be no wars on our Planet. It is vital for humanity, one and all.
At the same time, we recall Pushkin’s words: \u2018there is exhilaration in battle, and a gloomy abyss on the edge\u2019. This too is now a \u2018life-threatening syndrome\u2019. American film director Martin Scorsese has clearly shown the life-threatening appeal of violence as a cruel pleasure. Such a \u2018syndrome\u2019 must be overcome as soon as possible, and the sooner it is, the better it will be for all mankind. War is deadly for everyone and always deadly for all people.
At the same time, it should be said that there are other real threats to the life of humanity, of everyone. They too must be seen, they must be reckoned with, they must be explained and somehow overcome.
Nowadays we have already abandoned the theory that industrial carbon dioxide emission raises the temperature of the Earth’s surface. A new theory has emerged which claims that the natural process of degassing the Earth and the decay of the potassium isotope are influencing the warming of the Earth’s surface. For FW, this is a blatant pseudo-revelation.
Degassing means removing harmful gases. What harmful gases does the Earth have, how and where are they removed. This leaves us guessing. Potassium as an alkali metal ranks seventh in the Earth’s crust. It is not clear what it has to do with gases, the more harmful ones, and how exactly potassium affects the increase in the temperature of the Earth’s surface. The question remains open. The earth is too large for it to depend on some private and dubious processes occurring on its own.
Nanotechnology, which is considered a fundamental discovery, is actually a pseudo-discovery, extremely dangerous to human life. \u2018Nanotechnology\u2019 is already being used in medicine to replace red blood cells in human blood with nanoparticles. An injection is made and several trillion \u2018nanorobots\u2019 appear in human blood. It is difficult to even imagine it, much less directly feel it. Naturally, the lethal outcome of such an experiment is inevitable. It is not necessary to experiment on human beings and try to replace the natural with the artificial. Nothing useful for man will come out of it.
As Pushkin wrote: \u2018there are strange convergences in life\u2019, and they become true discoveries. Thus, back in 1913 in Russia was staged Mikhail Matyushin’s opera \u2018Victory over the Sun\u2019, in the design of which first appeared the famous \u2018Black Square\u2019 by artist Kazimir Malevich. \u2018Black Square\u2019 as a symbol of the cosmos defeated by itself destructive for humans impact of the strongest solar thermal radiation. And recently billionaire Bill Gates has offered with the help of special aerosols, forming the shape of \u2018black square\u2019, to protect certain areas of the Earth’s surface from destructive for them active solar thermal radiation. Let’s see what happens. In any case, \u2018convergence\u2019 is taking place.
It is often asserted that everyone needs to adhere to \u2018traditional values\u2019. This cannot be recognised as a discovery. Such \u2018values\u2019 are too vague and vague, and they are not given in a systematic way. There are reasons to say that the traditional value for all times and for all is interaction, material and spiritual, in nature, in society and in man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is considered a discovery in modern geopolitics to introduce the term \u2018velvet revolution\u2019 in a broad sense, which means a relatively \u2018soft\u2019, non-violent and at the same time fundamentally important transformation of what already exists. Obviously, it is also possible to introduce as a kind of term the notion of \u2018velvet discovery\u2019, meaning a non-violent, \u2018softly\u2019 perceived and fundamentally new discovery made in basic science. The FS can be considered in a certain sense an analogue of \u2018velvet discovery\u2019 as, in its turn, a certain analogue of \u2018velvet revolution\u2019.
At present, it is considered a fundamental discovery to completely replace human beings as pilots and chauffeurs in aviation and motor transport with devices. Practical attempts are already being made. From the FV point of view, it is very dangerous for the lives of people, passengers of such transport, and, in fact, is a pseudo-discovery.
A kind of experiment is already known, which took place back in 1986. The pilot of a TU-134 aeroplane consciously switched off from any own control of the aeroplane and entrusted all control to the instruments. Upon landing, the aircraft lost all orientation in space, hit the ground, crashed and burned. Many people in the plane died. It is worth repeating such an experiment, which is very instructive and fundamentally important. With \u2018autopilot\u2019 the pilot constantly monitors the instruments and corrects their readings.
No instrument, even the most perfect one, can fully replace a human being when controlling a complex system in motion. The instrument can only provide preliminary and relatively accurate data for control. Man’s spiritual and practical reaction to various surprises and sudden appearances is more sensible, more far-sighted, more operative and even faster than that of any device that is pre-programmed for certain readings. Instruments help a person to make his own decision. By the way, an instructor is put in a chauffeurless car for insurance.
There is a need for interaction between a person and devices, with a leading and controlling role of a person. It is unlikely that there will be many people willing to get into a car or aeroplane that is empty and without a chauffeur and pilot. It is very dangerous and very unfamiliar. People would probably prefer an aeroplane and a car with a pilot and chauffeur. Forewarned means forearmed. That is the reality.
Modern \u2018apologists\u2019 of unmanned air transport and motor transport need to remember that operating \u2018drones\u2019, small-sized aircraft controlled by a person from the ground, are different in principle from aeroplanes and cars without pilots and without chauffeurs. In this case, \u2018drone\u2019 refers to different phenomena. Etymology implies the exact meaning of a word when it is used. In relation to \u2018drone\u2019 this is not observed and not only in relation to it.
Nowadays there is a lot of talk and comparatively less writing (it is a very responsible and serious matter) about the necessity of \u2018multipolar world\u2019. Such a statement and such, if I may say so, concept of the FW can in no way be recognised as a scientific discovery and something useful for the development of science, materially and spiritually.
Let’s turn, and not for the first time, to etymology to \u2018save the world from delusion\u2019
The word \u2018pole\u2019 (from it the word \u2018polarity\u2019 is derived) – in Latin polus – means the imaginary extreme point of the Earth’s axis. As it is known, the axis can have only two ends. In principle, there can be no more. \u2018Bi\u2019 is Latin for \u2018two.\u2019 \u2018Bipolarity\u2019 is \u2018two poles\u2019 as two ends of the \u2018axis\u2019.
There are two poles on earth: north and south, two magnetic poles and two poles: cold and heat. It does not occur to anyone to increase the number of such \u2018poles\u2019 and add to them some more \u2018poles\u2019 with a different name and location on the Earth.
In geopolitics the case is more complicated.
For a long time there were two universally recognised \u2018poles\u2019: the USSR and the USA, which interacted materially and spiritually. Other countries, one way or another, were located between these \u2018poles\u2019 and also interacted, materially and spiritually. The world was fundamentally \u2018bipolar\u2019.
When \u2018one pole\u2019 historically weakened and \u2018the other pole\u2019 strengthened, they began to speak of a \u2018unipolar world\u2019 led by the USA. However, the other pole did not disappear at all. The USSR (then the Russian Federation), the PRC, Cuba, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, etc. remained.
At present, the world will also be and remain \u2018bipolar\u2019 in principle. \u2018One pole\u2019 is the PRC – a great socialist country. \u2018The other pole\u2019: the USA is a great capitalist country. Other countries, one way or another, will be positioned between these \u2018poles\u2019.
Individual countries and their various kinds of associations (unions, blocs, alliances, consortia, etc.) are in a hurry to declare themselves \u2018poles\u2019. In fact, it is a special \u2018multiregionality\u2019 with its centres calling themselves \u2018poles\u2019.
It is in the interests of the actual \u2018poles\u2019 and all regions to interact with each other materially and spiritually. Of course, in the most multilevel and diverse way.
Etymologically, with true science behind the etymology, it is believed that \u2018one\u2019 is \u2018little\u2019 and \u2018two\u2019 (\u2018bi\u2019) is \u2018many\u2019 (more than \u2018one\u2019). \u2018Many\u2019 is more than \u2018two.\u2019 Thus, \u2018multipolar world\u2019 etymologically means \u2018bi-polar world\u2019. The proponents of a \u2018multipolar world\u2019 are actually advocating, without realising it themselves, a \u2018bipolar world\u2019.
\u2018Multipolar world\u2019 is not being formed, they are masquerading under it, and not very skilfully.
\u2018Poles\u2019 are opposites that can and must interact. The fundamental and universal source of development, in fact, is not the struggle of opposites at all, but their multilevel and diverse interaction, ultimately material and spiritual. This is what the FV is convinced of, and it corresponds to reality. Struggle as violence does not stimulate development, but delays and even stops it. It is the interaction of different beginnings that gives rise to a new phenomenon and reveals the new in an already existing phenomenon. This is development, which can be positive and negative in its direction and result.
The purpose and meaning of \u2018bipolarity\u2019 is in the unswerving and unshakable universal and comprehensive establishment of world peace, peace without violence, material and spiritual. This is a truly fundamental and enduring discovery.
We can say that in the modern world, the rich and the poor are two inevitable socio-economic \u2018poles\u2019 that can and must interact, materially and spiritually, in mutual vital interests, material and spiritual. One \u2018pole\u2019 in principle does not exist outside and without the other \u2018pole\u2019. They are called to interact, materially and spiritually.
The interaction of material and spiritual principles, with the most important role of the spiritual beginning, is the basis for the development of science, its true discoveries.
It is considered a modern fundamental discovery to assert that there are real civilisations-states in the world. From the point of view of FS, this is a pseudo-discovery.
Civilisation, in essence, is broader and more multifaceted than the state.
The state of any country together with the country, one way or another, is a part of a certain and existing at the given time civilisation, which includes different countries with their states, and represents a historical period with special material and spiritual interaction in different spheres of material and spiritual life of mankind, all and everyone.
A state will remain a state, a civilisation will remain a civilisation.
What is born of civilisation is not the exclusive property of the state. States come and go. Civilisation remains.
True patriotism consists in valuing oneself highly, but not in considering oneself better and more perfect in everything, always, everywhere and in comparison with others. One should not confuse hubris with pride.
A truly fundamental scientific discovery is the discovery of a special kind of \u2018short strands\u2019 in DNA, which were previously considered \u2018rubbish\u2019. It turned out that it is the \u2018short ramifications\u2019 that regulate the speed and efficiency of transmission of hereditary traits in genes and make the manifestation of heredity individually inimitable. In this process the role of spiritual principles inherent in DNA and genes is great. They are in interaction, stimulating and directing this process.
Etymology closely interacts with history, which allows us to make a kind of discovery.
Rome, the capital of Italy, is a city. It is a masculine word, however, when written and pronounced it is called Roma – i.e. a feminine word. The matter is that personification of Ancient Rome was the pagan queen Roma, from it and the name Rome – Roma has gone, instead of from mythical Romola. We believe that for history this is an essential clarification. With the words \u2018Arriverderci, Roma\u2019 one says goodbye to the city of Rome as to a woman. This does not surprise anyone.
FV extends to a variety of phenomena, including love, which is a special and permanent discovery, of universal significance for everyone.
For FV, love is a \u2018binary\u2019 interaction of material and spiritual principles as attraction and restraint, the unexpected and the expected, the intimate and the open, the individual and the universal, the permanent and the temporary, the new and the familiar, inimitable and repetitive, tragic and comic, pleasure and suffering, accidental and regular, sudden and long, harmony and disharmony, sound and silence, inner and outer, familiar and unfamiliar, visible and invisible, national and extra-national, etc. \u0434. It is impossible to enumerate everything, and it is not necessary. Love is truly inexhaustible in its appearance and expression. And everywhere, always, in everything and in everyone, it is precisely the interaction of different beginnings, ultimately, material and spiritual.
In his \u2018Testament\u2019 (1895) Alfred Nobel stated that the Prize in his name should be awarded for \u2018the most outstanding work in the idealistic direction\u2019. For Nobel, this \u2018direction\u2019 was the recognition and expression of the essential role of the spiritual element (the \u2018ideal\u2019) in human life and in the \u2018establishment of world peace\u2019. All our WNCs also stand on such principled positions.
For science and life, the most important and significant are the fundamental discoveries that actually, directly and indirectly, contribute to world peace, peace without violence, material and spiritual, which is vital for humanity, each and every one, on our troubled planet.
At the same time, this does not exclude the negative and life-threatening use of fundamental discoveries, especially pseudo-discoveries.
In our report, we have carefully and thoroughly examined the fundamental basis for the existence of discovery and pseudo-discovery. We hope that there will be far more genuine scientific discoveries than pseudo-discoveries. This is what our \u2018cautious optimism\u2019 consists of. So be it. Thank you all for your attention and patience, what can we do, science requires sacrifices from us and of all kinds. C’est La Vie.
Once again to everyone here, directly and indirectly, thank you for your attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

24.11.2023
Paris<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Prof Andrei Iezuitoves, PhD, D.Sc. Academician Prof Santhi Jayasekera, PhD, D.Sc. Academician, Film Director Dear colleagues! I hope you will agree with me that the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":398,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-congress","category-philosophy","three-columns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=395"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":397,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395\/revisions\/397"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/worldscientists.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}